Thanks for the feedback. I've made some changes.
Coming back to this one. Just for context did not make it through fully back in April. Continuing from there...
Quotem17-18 LH I hear E under the G
Still hearing this on beat 2
• m60 LH 3.25 I think this is an E
• m63 LH 2.5 and 3.0 I hear a G for boh of these instead of F
• m68 RH still not hearing G on top but hearing Bb under C#
• m81 RH dotted quarter should be an 8th tied to a quarter
• m69 RH maybe move second RH layer a bit to the right so the dot on the Fn isn't hidden
• m97-98 RH maybe make the notes that carry over tied together?
• m102 beat 2.5 hear a An
• m104 RH beat 1 sounds like a dotted quarter, current beat 2 as an 8th note on 2.5
• m107 RH 3.0 think the G should be A still
• m113 LH 1.5 and 2.0 hearing as F's, 2.5 as G
• m115 RH I don't think C makes sense up here maybe just have two F's. The String part it's coming from I'm also not hearing do a G on beat 2.5 was that an arranged note as opposed to heard one?
• m118 LH 3.0 hearing this recurring figure (109,110,112) as two 8th's, just E and G. Highlighting here because were this is most audible
• m120 RH 3.5 hearing a G
• m123 LH 1.0 I think this is a G just like m127
QuoteHave you considered writing the LH part in m1-20 as simple chords and/or with arpeggio markings? Even my medium-sized hands can play D-A-F without much effort, and other chords can just as easily be rolled. I think that better approximates the original track than using 8th notes. Also applies to m83-92.
I do want to highlight this from Static last September though, do you have any thoughts on this idea he had?
Quotem95-96 LH: I'm not convinced this is the best way to write this part out, and it's not really reflective of anything in the original track either. It ends up just sounding too muddy. A low D tremolo I think would work a lot better.
Another Static call back, I don't think a trill is the best way to do this. Maybe E quarter note, then do a low D tremolo?