Went and did some more updates and cleanup. This is somehow more difficult than before, but I need some feedback from Daj on what he wants exactly relating to melodic and rhythmic identity in the last section. What should be done to it next?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Maelstrom on June 27, 2017, 12:29:39 PMI'm sorry, but this is a rule here. If it's not ready for the site, it doesn't belong in submissions. It's that simple. It should be here when it's good and ready, and not a moment before. Using the slow pace of submissions as an excuse doesn't validate an exception to the rule. Sorry, but this submission cannot stay here. Feel free to submit it again, but only after major improvements have been made, and not before.
Quote from: daj on June 27, 2017, 05:50:56 AMReally solid advice that I'm definitely going to trust because the sections you're commenting on were really awesome in your arrangement of this piece
Quote from: Yug_Guy on June 25, 2017, 11:49:12 AMstuffWill do. The reason this is technically a collaboration with Bespinben is I used his incomplete version as a base to work off of, and I want to give him credit for the parts that were already built. Was there a better way to phrase that than collaboration?
Quote from: Zeila on November 26, 2015, 01:05:04 AMI believe he meant placing triads (a group of three notes) is impractical at that speed, but I could be wrongThree problems with that interpretation: he was describing changes relating to transcription instead of difficulty, there were no quarter notes with triads in the original version because of the halved speed on the measures, and the only triads that lead into each other with 16ths with the new version that are in the piece are pretty natural progressions outside of the left hand rolled chords which have a space to prepare your hand before each of them.
Page created in 0.189 seconds with 16 queries.