Okay, I'm not sure if this is worth asking or starting a new topic, but I have a question:
Ruby and Sapphire are the most-criticized games in the Pokemon series. However, maybe because my first Pokemon game was Ruby, I don't really see anything terrible about them. To those of y'all that don't like it, do you not like it as a game, or just because it didn't live up to Gold and Silver?
I like R/S. They introduced Abilities, new Pokemon, double battles, coolest legendaries (except perhaps Ho-Oh/Lugia), and berries with actual names, not to mention finally distinguishing between the Special stats...
Just a thought.
Ruby and Sapphire are the most-criticized games in the Pokemon series. However, maybe because my first Pokemon game was Ruby, I don't really see anything terrible about them. To those of y'all that don't like it, do you not like it as a game, or just because it didn't live up to Gold and Silver?
I like R/S. They introduced Abilities, new Pokemon, double battles, coolest legendaries (except perhaps Ho-Oh/Lugia), and berries with actual names, not to mention finally distinguishing between the Special stats...
Just a thought.