Dang. It's really nice to hear things from this from members after so many years! It was a chaotic time and I'm glad we can look back at it and close that chapter now.
I hope he's doing well.
I hope he's doing well.
Subscribe to our Twitch Channel!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Static39 on November 30, 2024, 04:42:22 PMNice sheet! I'm not an expert, but I think 9ths are the largest acceptable interval for most people. I know for me personally unless I'm rolling it or using my other hand I can't consistently play anything over 9ths.Yep, I agree! My rule of thumb and what I'll suggest to others writing arrangements is:
(Also unless I'm missing something I think you have a typo in your "Energetic" musical direction )
Quote from: Gustnado on August 18, 2024, 10:54:32 AMHowever, when I first done the arrangement (mostly by memory, even before I transcripted it on Musescore), I came up with a slightly different melody from bar 72 up to bar 92. In my opinion, the original melody sounds a bit weird on the piano. Tell me what you think!Were you trying to create your own melody here? The melody you wrote in the first version sounds correct and fine on piano to me!
Quote from: Bloop on July 12, 2024, 01:24:46 PM-m1-4: After one repeat (and also continuing in m5-8), there seems to be an added fifth to the guitar chords.Wow that is quite subtle. I like it, adding it helps with the buildup of intensity in the intro! Removed the repeat on the first four bars and added the fifths in the right hand. Note from here on the measure numbers of the feedback are going to be offset by 4 because of this insertion.
Quote from: Bloop on July 12, 2024, 01:24:46 PM-m73: Do you think there's a way to add some ties into the R.H. note here, since it's tied over from m56? There's some shenanigans you could do with an extra measure that's excluded from the measure numbering that has a chord with invisible noteheads that ties into this measure, but maybe there's an easier solution lol.Oh yeah, I forgot to do something about that. This might not be the best solution but I added a grace note chord at the beginning of the measure, and changed the notehead and stem symbols to things that appear blank to me, then pushed it left a bit. Let me know if this looks okay on your end! I also added a dash manually here through Text > Insert Hard Hyphen and pushed it left to match the other similar places (current m. 61).
Quote from: Bloop on July 12, 2024, 01:24:46 PM-m83 and 87: Maybe it's easier for the R.H. to take the upper note in these measures? They're pretty stretchy for the L.H.I wanted to keep the melody 1-1 with the lyrics here and figured it was easily enough implied to have the RH take the top notes of those chords, but I realize I've put more notes under the melody in the RH in other sections anyway. Poked those few up! (Didn't bother tying them over into the next measures)
Quote from: Bloop on July 12, 2024, 01:24:46 PM-m117: The R.H. doesn't go up in the original, it stays on the G instead.If that's the only c/p error I've made in this long sheet, I'd call that an overall win! Haha, thanks for catching it.
Quote from: Bloop on July 12, 2024, 01:24:46 PM-I don't remember if or how this song repeats in-game, is that something you feel like figuring out and including in the arrangement?Let me explore that a little bit and get back to you about that later; I don't remember myself. Everything else above has been updated though! Thanks again!
Quote from: Fantastic Ike on August 26, 2024, 09:00:32 AMI left them out because...I don't really hear them lol. I could try to add in some implied harmony but I went for accuracy to the song over consistency if that makes sense.Hm that makes sense, but I feel like the accompaniment texture as a whole is still similar in that last section. I think it would make sense to keep it consistent throughout the piece especially since the piece is building to a climax at the end. How would you feel about that?
Quote from: TheZeldaPianist275 on September 10, 2024, 07:44:48 AM-Are there any differences between Finale's and Musescore's respective formatting that appear to be unsurmountable? If I remember correctly from seeing some MuseScore sheets back in the day, the notation never appeared as sharp and crisp as sheets that were written natively in Finale, for example.Not anymore! By default, MuseScore sheets do look pretty different from sheets made from the Finale template we've been using. But we (@XiaoMigros in particular) have been doing a bunch of investigation around matching the same fonts/styles in MuseScore to meet visual parity. You can get a sneak peek of that with @Static's sheet here, where the PDFs generated from the Finale and MuseScore versions look remarkably similar. We'll have more guidance around this to come soon (tm).
Quote from: TheZeldaPianist275 on September 10, 2024, 07:44:48 AM-Down the road, when Finale versions are more or less unusable because of lack of developer support, will the option to submit .mus files be removed entirely? Or is that a bridge to cross when we get there?No plan at the moment. We'll think more about that as time goes on and we have fewer members around who have the program readily available to use. Even without any further developer support, we can still manage to get by with the state Finale is in today.
Quote from: TheZeldaPianist275 on September 10, 2024, 07:44:48 AM-What can the shock troops in the community (me) do to be helpful for the transition process here?Thank you (and others who I've been talking to as well) for offering to help I'd say these few things for now:
Page created in 0.508 seconds with 17 queries.