Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Th3Gavst3r

#61
Quote from: Maelstrom on January 11, 2021, 01:14:24 PMm5 and m8 both sound like there's an octave harmony below b1, shouldn't make it too much harder to play if you add it in.
Oh yeah I think you're right. They're in.

Quote from: Maelstrom on January 11, 2021, 01:14:24 PMMabe give your ties a bit of breathing room? The slurs are getting awful close to them. Should be able to respace systems if the slurs need more space.
Moved all the slurs up a little bit
#62
Quote from: Latios212 on January 11, 2021, 07:52:29 PMIt sounds to me like the D "pops" more for those offbeat G major chords - thoughts about inverting them down?
I picked that inversion based on Finale's piano because the lower one sounded pretty muddy, but I tried it on a couple other pianos and it sounds alright. Changed it to D on top

Quote from: Latios212 on January 11, 2021, 07:52:29 PMThat's pretty much it (although I think your staff lines are a bit thick) :P
Dethickened
#63
Quote from: Latios212 on January 10, 2021, 07:54:54 PM- I think this would make more sense in 6/4 as each phrase currently spans two 3/4 bars
Ooh that's a good call. I'll take any chance to use weird time sigs :P

Quote from: Latios212 on January 10, 2021, 07:54:54 PM- It seems a bit spacey... you could condense the last three systems into two but I can see why you wouldn't want to and I guess that's fine by me
It's even more spacey with 6/4 measures, so I think the whole thing fits pretty comfortably on 2 systems now
#66
Quote from: Static on November 14, 2020, 02:15:14 PMBecause of the relatively slow-ish tempo, I think you could add those 32nd note bits if you want. I don't think it would make it that much more difficult. Otherwise, looks fantastic.

The real deal doubles the bottom tone on each 32nd note, but I think it sounds ok split. The playability doesn't seem too bad either, just a bit of a stretch on m1b3, so I added the 32nds \o/
#67
Quote from: Libera on October 31, 2020, 06:09:52 AM-I think the A# should be an An in bar 4.
You're right, good ear

Quote from: Libera on October 31, 2020, 06:09:52 AM-Have you considered raising the RH by an octave so that it doesn't overlap with the left hand quite so much?
I had not, but now I have and have also included the consideration :p
#70
Quote from: Static on October 23, 2020, 06:31:00 AMm28 and 44 look the same to me in the new file. Sorry if I was unclear but I meant removing the 16th notes from the LH part.
Looking at it again, I noticed some extra doubled notes (the last 16th notes in m29-30 and 45-46). This is what I'm suggesting:
Spoiler
[close]
Ohh k I think I see what you were saying now. I went back over the sheet looking for overlaps and replaced a lot of notes in the RH with rests, and added couple of parentheses in the LH.
Pretty sure all the places I changed are
* m16-22, m28-21, m44-46 RH rests
* m28,44 LH parens
#71
Quote from: Static on October 21, 2020, 01:13:22 PM
  • You don't need the extra 16th notes in m28 and 44 because they're doubled in the RH - those measures should look just like m29 and 44.
Great point, took those out

In the spirit of consistency, I also nudged a few notes in the LH in measures 37-41 to keep those patterns similar.
#72
Quote from: Latios212 on October 17, 2020, 07:22:50 AM- Opening dynamics!
Whoops D:

Quote from: Latios212 on October 17, 2020, 07:22:50 AM- m. 13 - Ab chord (change the top note from G# to Ab). I'd also recommend spelling the third chord as F# major.
- m. 15 - hide the rest in the lower staff, and add a natural to display on the last B (press P twice).
Nice catches! Added em all


Quote from: Latios212 on October 17, 2020, 07:22:50 AM- I think you're missing two bars between m. 35-36...
Whoops D:

Quote from: Latios212 on October 17, 2020, 07:22:50 AM- On the not-first pages, I'd recommend putting the systems a bit closer together to make a little more room for the header.
Social distanced
#74
Quote from: Libera on September 20, 2020, 10:36:10 AMI don't have anything else to add.  It looks good other than the Gb -> F#.

Quote from: Latios212 on September 19, 2020, 08:32:51 AMI think the Gb in the LH in m. 1 would be better as an F# (chromatic neighboring tone to the G in the next measure).

That's all :)

Sharpened
#75
Quote from: Libera on September 19, 2020, 03:22:34 AMIt sounds to me like there's another G on beat 1.5 in the left hand in bar 4.  Other than that, looks great!

I double checked and there's definitely just the one extended G there

Quote from: Latios212 on September 19, 2020, 08:30:27 AMJust one thing to add in addition to Libera's comment - it sounds like the F# in the RH beat 1.75 in measure 3 is actually a part of the upper layer (descending G-F#-E unlike measure 1). I think it works fine lowered to match m. 1 and have the lower line chromatically ascend, but just wanted to point that out - that I do hear it as part of the top melody.

Yeah you're totally right, that F# is just raised an octave away from the chromatic scale out of nowhere. I think I like it better musically lowered an octave, but with these straightforward NES transcriptions I like accuracy so I changed it :p