The sheet has been updated with all of the above addressed.
Local man invests life savings into turnips. When asked whether it was a wise decision he responded, "Eh. I'm sure someone will buy them."
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: XiaoMigros on February 26, 2024, 08:39:21 AMcould you perhaps do 4-5-4 systems per page instead of 5-5-3?Done! I hope the spacing on the first page is okay. I was trying to even it out with the other pages.
Quote from: XiaoMigros on February 13, 2024, 01:15:24 PMI think the few measures following m78 could benefit from it- the timpani is the only instrument here in the LH except for the brass hits, adding it would help make it stand out from m70-77.While I agree it'd make it stand out, I can't find a way to write it that'd make it sound good when mixed with what's already written. I've tried using the actual notes the timpani plays and I've tried doing what I did for the introductory measures with the one note being played to the timpani's rhythm. Nothing is agreeing with me on that front.
Quote from: Latios212 on February 05, 2024, 05:53:56 PM- I missed this before, but the Fn in the left hand should actually be sharp as wellI assume you meant measure 11 for this, but let me know if I got it wrong.
Quote from: Latios212 on February 05, 2024, 05:53:56 PMLastly, this is kind of annoying, but it sounds like in m. 8, the second repetition only, the bass plays G# on beat 2.5 instead of G (similar to m. 4). I'd maybe suggest verifying another source as this is a bit strange, but if it is the case it might be best to just write the whole thing out with no repeats. :/That is annoying, but easily fixable.
Quote from: XiaoMigros on February 03, 2024, 10:42:46 AMI'd agree that the first few measures felt somewhat empty, so I tried implementing the rhythm of the timpani to the left hand a little. I still wanted the notes held to an extent.
- I feel like this arrangement lacks the intensity of the original in some places. I think to combat this you could try to include more of the timpani, especially in places where there's not much going on in the bass otherwise.
Quote from: XiaoMigros on February 03, 2024, 10:42:46 AMI think it wouldn't be necessary, given it has the same rhythm mixed in with the triplets that jump in on measure 58. Not to mention the timpani plays a similar rhythm in the earlier measures, including the introductory section I mentioned earlier. I feel if we really wanted to change the time signature, I'd have to change it for the entire piece.
- m50: Thoughts on perhaps changing the time signature here? The current groupings make this part more difficult to read.
Quote from: XiaoMigros on February 03, 2024, 11:24:14 AMThe notes sound closer to portato to me. I think the organ holds longer than the brass, which may have confused me initially. I put a few tenuto markings on them to try and illustrate how they're played. Everything else has been changed accordingly.
- m6 & 10: The RH note sound sustained to me, no rests. m11 beat 1 does sound like a rest though, for the record
Quote from: Latios212 on January 29, 2024, 08:49:17 PMYou did mention it in your original post, haha it's updated now!Oops! Silly me!
Page created in 0.061 seconds with 16 queries.