Quote from: Bloop on March 05, 2024, 03:44:43 AM-In some beats (for example beat 3 of m1 or beat 2 of m2), you have 16th rest - staccato 8th - 16h rest. Maybe those places would look a bit better as 16th rest - 16th note - 8th rest?My thought for these places was to show where the right hand and left hand parts line up and to make it obvious that the note lengths are supposed to be the same between hands. However, I do see how readablility may be better in some ways with the suggested rhythm so I'm not against changing it, I just wanted to explain my thoughts first. If you think the other way is better I'd be happy to change it!
Quote from: Bloop on March 05, 2024, 03:44:43 AM-m9 and similar measures: I hear an F# instead of an A in the L.H. on beat 4.5I hear that too now, done.
Quote from: Bloop on March 05, 2024, 03:44:43 AM-m12 and similar measures: I hear an A instead of an E in the low notes in the L.H. However, the L.H. in these measures is quite hard to play at speed. For m12 and 16 you could do something akin to this:I definitely see how this part is difficult. I like what you've suggested for the first one - for m16 I had to change the right hand a bit due to the different melody, but I think it works out alright. For the second one, I've made one small change from your suggestion - I think making beat 3.5 an A instead matches up with the original bassline better and doesn't add too much difficulty. Thanks for the ideas here!
You cannot view this attachment.
It's still on the harder side of things but possible, but this won't really work for m20 and 24 because of the high fifths in the R.H.. Another option that does work for m20 and 24 is this:
You cannot view this attachment.
It's less true to the original notes, but I think it gets the same feeling across of a syncopation. The L.H. here plays in the empty spaces of the R.H. and holds the low A for filler and to imitate the low A's that aren't currently played.
Quote from: Bloop on March 05, 2024, 03:44:43 AM-m16: The R.H. B on beat 4.75 should be a C#Both done.
-m20: You can write the 16th note + 16th rest in the R.H. in beat 3.25 as a staccato 8th, like in m12.
Quote from: Bloop on March 05, 2024, 03:44:43 AM-m22: I don't think it's feasily possible to play the quick fifths in beat 3-4 in the R.H. (except for the very, very virtuosic individuals). It's probably best to just leave out the bottom or top note of all these fifths (depending on what you hear as the melody voice)-Yeah I definitely agree this part is way too difficult to execute. I think the bottom line is more the melody here since the upper 5ths were added in for the second repeat, and it sounds a little more complete to my ear.
-m23: It's a little bit hard to play this run of three fifths on beat 4.25 too, maybe you could just leave out the bottom note of the first one?
-Taking out the bottom note of the first one works for me.
Quote from: Bloop on March 05, 2024, 03:44:43 AM-m26 and 28: I hear an A instead of an F# in the L.H. on beat 4.5-I think you're right, done.
-m30 and 32: Similarly to above, I hear an A-D instead of F#-B. Also, I think it might be easier to play beats 1.5 to 3.75 with one note per hand instead of switching hands: the parallel fourths are harder to play than just single note lines in both hands.
-Yeah I did a lot of playtesting in this section and splitting the fourths was definitely easier for m29/31, but it was less clear cut for m30/32. Splitting the two lines for the first part of the measure is fine with me.
Quote from: Bloop on March 05, 2024, 03:44:43 AM-m40: There's a F# on beat 1 in the R.H. here (and a C# too, but I think that might be a bit too stretchy to reach after m39)Got it, done.
Thanks so much for the super detailed feedback! I know this is quite a difficult arrangement so all the little playability suggestions are greatly appreciated. Hopefully I got everything!