managed to find something that fit my criteria for what i was looking for. while it did lack sheet music, i still think i can work with this.
NinSheetMusic is 1264 years old!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Static on April 11, 2022, 10:00:33 AMHey, sorry for the wait on this one! I'll start with note accuracy stuff as well (I'll be using the current incorrect measure numbers as Libera did in the previous post):
- m2, 3, 4, etc. RH beat 4.5: Like Libera, I hear these notes longer/tied over to beat 1 of the following measure. To me, it sounds like there's almost no space in between those notes.
- m5 RH beat 3: In the lower layer, the C should be D.
- m6 RH beat 1: In the lower layer, I'd recommend just changing this to an 8th note (but keep it in the lower layer). That dyad is repeated several times in the same measure, so it's impossible to really hold it down in the middle of all that. In a performance setting, it would sound the same whether or not it was written as a whole note, but writing it as an 8th is less confusing.
- m9 LH beats 1-2: Bass plays F here instead of E.
- m10 LH should look just like m9 after the above change is implemented.
- m10 RH beat 4.75: The last 16th note here should be C instead of F.
- m12 beat 4: In both the RH and LH, this last quarter note is played long/tenuto instead of short.
- m16 LH beat 4: Bass stays on G here.
- m18 LH beat 4: Bass moves to F here.
- m21-36: I hear this section harmonized a bit differently, like this:m21-28
(m29-36 is the same, just transposed)[close]
- m24/28/32/36 LH: The bass plays a D/D# (respectively) here, it's a Gm/G#m chord but in 2nd inversion.
- m37-39, 41-43 RH: There are only two voices in these measures (just the bottom and top voices you currently have).
- m39/43 RH beat 4.5: Lower voice should be C instead of D.
- m40/44 RH beat 4: Lower voice should be C instead of D.
- m45-50 is harmonized exactly like m37-43.
Lmk if you have any questions
Quote- m44 RH beat 4.5: This dyad should be Bb (below staff) and G (middle of staff).
- m44 RH: This might look better in bass clef, at least up until beat 4.5.
Quote from: Latios212 on April 10, 2022, 11:44:32 AMI think this could be improved on a bit further - the distribution of space is currently more squished on the third and fourth systems. I'd suggest 4-5-5-5-5 to make it more even. You lose the neat system breaks between sections, but this piece is straightforward enough I don't think that's a big deal... (let me know if you want help editing it)Spoiler
You cannot view this attachment.[close]
- The composer/arranger text are too close
- I would suggest removing the top note for each chord in m. 1-8 because of the overlap with the right hand.
- The melody actually continues playing G# on beat 1 of m. 2/4/6. There's a bit of dissonance in the original between the melody G# and the A in the bass
- The second and third melody notes in m. 8 are B# and C# instead of C# and D#.
I'll come back for the rest (m. 9-end) afterwards to avoid putting too much in one post
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 04, 2022, 10:17:50 AMThis looks really good! Here's my two cents on this:..aand that's it from me! I like how you simulated the snare hits by adding more detailed chords to your sheet. Maybe they could be used to fill the empty space where there are sustained whole notes? Up to you
- Have you tried experimenting with pedal use? Not only would it add more depth to the sheet but it would also help imitate the synths better, and it would be possible to play the F#6 in m23 on beat 1 rather than beat 5.
- Speaking of m23, I think the F#6 would be better written in another layer. I also question the E# in the LH, it seems a bit odd to suddenly have a triad there when the rest of the time it doesn't play any.
- I'd also remove the E#4 in m24, I can't hear it being played in the original, and it would provide more coherence with the F#6 played in the measure prior.
- The rest of the stuff is Finale-specific, I'm not sure how easy it is to solve in notepad so me or an updater could sort it out for you once everything else is ready. Just some stuff like system spacing, text placement and other minor adjustments. If it's possible in notepad, I'd revise your system spacing. If you want to keep everything on one page, I'd recommend 4-4-6-6-4 measures per system, from top to bottom, rather than the 4-4-6-7-3 that you have now. Makes the sheet look more even
Page created in 0.069 seconds with 21 queries.