All Hail President Bowser!
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMI guess the bass already has an Eb, so that one isn't important and I removed it
- m6: Not hearing the Eb at beat 1 RH
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMThe C4 does sound better, but I can't figure out what you're talking about with the C3 on beat 2.5. There aren't any notes at all on beat 2.5, and I don't hear any other C3s aside from what's already written
- m7: Hearing C4 instead of G at LH beat 1, and a C3 at beat 2.5
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMSure
- m9 & 13: The B at beat 1 in the RH sounds an octave lower
- m10 & 14: The Bb at beat 1 in the RH sounds an octave lower
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMMaybe, but that would be very difficult to play coming out of those chromatic 16th notes the beat before
- m11: I think I hear D4 at beat 1?
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMI guess the Fn can come from the LH on beat 2 instead, but Bb3 and D4 would be impossible to play
- m15: I hear Bb3 and D4 instead of F4 at beat 1
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMIf moved cross-staff, that Bb causes a lot of visual clutter with the B naturals on beat 4
- m18: The high LH Bb could be cross-staved? The beam can stay below the staff as to not add extra clutter
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMIn the original, it's an impossible D4. When raising it to a playable D5, I thought an octave+3rd on beat 4 was slightly jarring coming from a unison Bb on beat 3, and that doubling the root instead sounded smoother. But you do lose the D completely with that approach, so I've changed it back.
- m18: Beat 4 in the RH should have a D instead of F
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMPlaying an A3 on beat 1 is impossible, and lowering it to an A2 muddies the rest of the base contour significantly. And I don't hear any new strikes on beat 4.5
- m23: I hear additional A3s at beat 3 and possibly 4.5
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMI thought it would come across that layer 2 was intended to be played with the LH, but if you use a treble clef that whole part fits comfortably into the bottom staff anyway
- m2: Thoughts on making the RH lower layer part of the LH? I think it's most comfortable to play that way and also visually looks better. You could start using the treble clef in m1 as well
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMYeah it looks like Finale snaps the number to just outside the staff for some reason. I moved it down a little bit
- m7: The tuplet number in the LH seems too high up (in the PDF at least)
Quote from: XiaoMigros on April 10, 2024, 05:47:50 AMI'm assuming you meant m10 instead of 11? Adjusted all of those
- m5, 9, && 11: Very nitpicky but these markings could be more appropriately centered between staves. The text expressions can also start slightly before the notes
Page created in 0.071 seconds with 14 queries.