[PC] Yume Nikki - "Flute Player" by Rwars

[Zeta]

Submission Information:
Series: Other
Game: Yume Nikki
Console: PC
Title: Flute Player
Instrumentation Solo Piano
Arranger: Rwars

[attachment deleted by admin]

[Rwars]

going to focus on yume nikki for a bit, maybe, something to calm me down with

[Olimar12345]

You have all of the right notes, just written in weird octaves. I'd remove all 8vas since they aren't needed anywhere in this sheet, then transpose everything up to their correct octave. After that, move the LH up another octave since that is how it plays in the recording. I'd put it in treble clef too.

[Rwars]

You have all of the right notes, just written in weird octaves. I'd remove all 8vas since they aren't needed anywhere in this sheet, then transpose everything up to their correct octave. After that, move the LH up another octave since that is how it plays in the recording. I'd put it in treble clef too.

Well, I did it. Is this better?

[Latios212]

Much better!

- I think there shouldn't be any ties in the left hand. It sounds to me like the notes are re-struck at the beginning of the respective measures.
- You may want to consider halving both the tempo and note durations - a tempo marking of 140 implies a brisk pace as opposed to the relaxed sound of the original. You won't have to rewrite anything - you can just highlight everything, select Utilities > Change Note Durations, and set it to 50%.

[Olimar12345]

Also maybe lower the first system and composer/arrangers a tad? (since you have the space) In the formatting guidelines the image clearly shows those fields below the subtitle, whereas yours are in-line with them. Ttry to make it more like that when applicable.

[Rwars]

- I think there shouldn't be any ties in the left hand. It sounds to me like the notes are re-struck at the beginning of the respective measures.
- You may want to consider halving both the tempo and note durations - a tempo marking of 140 implies a brisk pace as opposed to the relaxed sound of the original. You won't have to rewrite anything - you can just highlight everything, select Utilities > Change Note Durations, and set it to 50%.

I probably wouldn't have realized that was a thing, changing the note durations. Also, I think the whole note being restuck thing is probably just a part of the audio and instrumentation more than them actually being struck. That, and if they're restruck, it doesn't sound as good.

Also maybe lower the first system and composer/arrangers a tad? (since you have the space) In the formatting guidelines the image clearly shows those fields below the subtitle, whereas yours are in-line with them. Try to make it more like that when applicable.

Done! uwu

[Latios212]

I'm pretty sure the notes are restruck, but I suppose it's fine to keep it as it is if you want.

You could also just make this sheet one system instead of stretching everything out.

Aside from that, looks good!

[Rwars]

You could also just make this sheet one system instead of stretching everything out.

This song is so short that I'd want to have 2 systems in it so at least a bit of the paper is used.

[Olimar12345]

^I agree.

[Sebastian]

Excellent work.

Couple things:
- There's quite a gap between the composer/arranger names. I would recommend putting them in the same text box.

- Center the dynamic in M. 1 between the staves. It's closer to the top staff currently.
- change "https" to "http" in the copyright information.

Also, I'm chill with keeping the measure distribution as is.

That's all I got! Fix this stuff and we're good here.

[Brassman388]

Bump for arranger.

[Rwars]

I'm back, and I have now made the composer/arranger lines closer, and fixed the dynamic issue.

[Zeta]

This submission has been accepted by Latios212.

~Zeta, your friendly NSM-Bot