Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Latios212]

Splendid. Approved!

[mastersuperfan]

Looks good, just some small things:
- The composer and arranger information should be moved lower. Right now, the first line of your composer info is at the same height as the subtitle; however, the first line of the composer info should be below the subtitle.
- In your composer info, you use "&", whereas in your arranger info, you use "and". I would suggest picking one and using it for both.
- For the copyright info, Advance Communication Company was the developer and should also be included. Additionally, the full name of the publisher was Victor Musical Industries at the time of the release, not just Victor. So the copyright info should look something like this: "Advance Communication Company, Victor Musical Industries © 1991".
- Your LH and RH staves are pretty close to each other (i.e. there is not much space between the staves). I think it would look nicer/more conventional for the space to be widened more. (If you do so, make sure you also adjust the position of the dynamic in m1 to keep it centered between the two staves.)

[JacopoTore]

Looks good, just some small things:
- The composer and arranger information should be moved lower. Right now, the first line of your composer info is at the same height as the subtitle; however, the first line of the composer info should be below the subtitle.
- In your composer info, you use "&", whereas in your arranger info, you use "and". I would suggest picking one and using it for both.
- For the copyright info, Advance Communication Company was the developer and should also be included. Additionally, the full name of the publisher was Victor Musical Industries at the time of the release, not just Victor. So the copyright info should look something like this: "Advance Communication Company, Victor Musical Industries © 1991".
- Your LH and RH staves are pretty close to each other (i.e. there is not much space between the staves). I think it would look nicer/more conventional for the space to be widened more. (If you do so, make sure you also adjust the position of the dynamic in m1 to keep it centered between the two staves.)

Thank you!
Did it

[mastersuperfan]

Looks great!

[Zeta]

This submission has been accepted by mastersuperfan.

~Zeta, your friendly NSM-Bot