Hello,
I just wanted the sheet music to be closer than the original piece and still playable off course. I cannot submit this kind of proposition? It's my first submission, so I'm sorry if I'm not quite aware of all the rules!
So here are the differences between my version and Thomas Wilson's one:
- Measure 1, beat 3.5 : The G is a F sharp
- Measure 3, beat 2.25 : The G sharp is a G or, as written, a F double sharp since there is a chromatic mouvement from F sharp to G sharp
- Measure 3, beat 3.5 and 4.25 : There are notes that double the melody above it
- Measure 5, beat 3 : The A sharp is hold
- Measure 6, beat 2 : The rhythm on the left hand was wrong compared to the original
- Measure 6, beat 4 : The A sharp is a A natural
- Measure 7, beat 3 : Once again, the A sharp is hold
- Measure 8, beat 4.25 : The low A is natural (blue note)
- Measure 13 : On the left hand, the D's and A's are natural (bVI and bVII degrees)
- Measure 15, beat 2 : The rhythm is ternary (swing)
- Measure 17, beat 3 : Idem
+ several appoggiaturas added and shorter articulations (staccatos, quavers).
And once again, despite I've red Thomas Wilson's sheet, I started over by using the .nsf files and FamiTracker to read it. So it's my work. But, yes, it's close to the previous one!
About measure 2, I agree on beat 1.5 but to me, on beat 2, since the melody goes down, the A natural is just fine here. By the way, following the same logic, I should change several appoggiaturas... I made them simpler to read although they aren't written the "normal" way...
About the repeat, I know it's wierd but since measures 18 and 2 are different, what do you suggest?