Ever stumbled upon an old sheet on site that needed to be replaced? Today, we present to you a new iteration of Yug Guy’s
awesome spreadsheet from several years ago...
The Great NSM Audit 2.0We’ve augmented Yug Guy’s spreadsheet to include a rough rating of how badly each listed sheets needs to be replaced. The ratings mean the following:
1 - The sheet is solid in terms of accuracy, playability, and presentation. It just needs some minor updates (such as the URL) and may be edited in the future by the updating team or another arranger.
2 - The sheet is functional, but needs some work. It may require rewriting some parts to make them more accurate or playable. It will probably need some considerable revision with the original arranger’s permission, or can be replaced outright.
3 - This sheet has clear basic flaws. Sections may be unplayable or bear a poor resemblance to the source material. A replacement should be made from scratch.
M - This sheet is not functional as a piano arrangement. It may be completely unplayable, sound totally wrong, or make no sense to read. A replacement should be made from scratch.
So, what does this mean?The goal is to bring every sheet on the main site up to standard! The point of this spreadsheet is to paint a better picture of how much work there is left to do, and provide a rough order of priority - to show which sheets need the most work and would be best to replace first. Please feel free to browse and pick out a replacement to do that’s sorely needed!
Maintenance-wise, feel free to leave a reply in this topic with any questions. We’ll keep this updated and remove rows as sheets are replaced. If you have a comment about any one sheet/rating in particular though, it’d probably be easiest to leave a comment on the spreadsheet itself.
Happy arranging!
