[MUL] Trivia Murder Party - List of the Dead Song
[MUS] (https://www.dropbox.com/s/r8egr3pijzy6ebc/TMP%20-%20List%20of%20the%20Dead.mus?dl=1) | [MUSX] (https://www.dropbox.com/s/irezij7igjy8lww/TMP%20-%20List%20of%20the%20Dead.musx?dl=1)
The official name is from this (https://store.steampowered.com/app/577810/The_Jackbox_Party_Pack_3__Soundtrack/), and I figure that it would be better to have the game be classified under "Trivia Murder Party" instead of "The Jackbox Party Pack 3", although I don't mind changing it in the sheet itself. Also, the run at measure 29 was simplified
Great pick! That's a fun game on the collection for sure
m1 LH b2 - I only hear a single Bb here, no harmony
m16 RH - there's a note here and it's a Bb
Maybe a rubato in the tempo marking? Or somewhere.
This sheet could use a healthy dose of 8vas/celf changes. The ledger lines get a bit insane and borderline illegible at times.
Quote from: Kricketune54 on October 08, 2020, 06:02:56 PMGreat pick! That's a fun game on the collection for sure
Yeah it's certainly fun to play with friends :3
Quote from: Maelstrom on October 10, 2020, 01:16:41 PMm1 LH b2 - I only hear a single Bb here, no harmony
I think the G is quieter than the Bb, but I still hear one on beat 2
Quote from: Maelstrom on October 10, 2020, 01:16:41 PMm16 RH - there's a note here and it's a Bb
I don't hear this at all
Quote from: Maelstrom on October 10, 2020, 01:16:41 PMMaybe a rubato in the tempo marking? Or somewhere.
Done
Quote from: Maelstrom on October 10, 2020, 01:16:41 PMThis sheet could use a healthy dose of 8vas/celf changes. The ledger lines get a bit insane and borderline illegible at times.
I thought it would be okay since some of the notes are relative to others within some interval, but sure. I added clef changes but I left the RH alone
Quote from: Zeila on October 17, 2020, 03:45:41 PMI don't hear this at all
I hear this loud and clear. If the next updater could specifically check for this, I can approve it.
While I will approve it regardless, might I recommend an 8va for m11-16 and 21-24 RH? I think it would make the parts much easier to sight read, and most of the transitions in/out of these sections are dotted half notes, so mental transitions to and from the 8va should be negligible. I can't see a reason not to include these.
- I think the An's in m. 13/43 may be better as Bbb's (Cb7 chord). Same for m. 29 - and there you could write the G# as Ab if you write the An as Bbb
- End the crescendo before (not on) the barline in m. 16
- m. 26 is missing the lower octave Dn in the left hand. I would suggest prioritizing that over the F to preserve the descending bass pattern
- I'd consider dropping m. 31 LH down an octave
- Fermata on the last LH note
Quote from: Maelstrom on October 10, 2020, 01:16:41 PMm16 RH - there's a note here and it's a Bb
Quote from: Zeila on October 17, 2020, 03:45:41 PMI don't hear this at all
Quote from: Maelstrom on October 18, 2020, 07:42:02 AMI hear this loud and clear. If the next updater could specifically check for this, I can approve it.
I don't think I hear it either.
Quote from: Maelstrom on October 18, 2020, 07:42:02 AMWhile I will approve it regardless, might I recommend an 8va for m11-16 and 21-24 RH? I think it would make the parts much easier to sight read, and most of the transitions in/out of these sections are dotted half notes, so mental transitions to and from the 8va should be negligible. I can't see a reason not to include these.
I think 11-16 as fine as is (it starts out with a phrase similar to other sections, and only goes a bit higher). On the other hand, yes I think 21-24 would be much better using an 8va.
Speaking of that section:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/401094846107877377/767464459148460052/unknown.png
The keysig contains a lot of flats, but the contour of the octaves here (i.e. descending/ascending pairs of chromatic tones) is visually lost the way it's currently written. I think this makes it a bit easier to read, but lemme know what you think.
Quote from: Latios212 on October 18, 2020, 12:13:27 PMSpeaking of that section:
~snip~
The keysig contains a lot of flats, but the contour of the octaves here (i.e. descending/ascending pairs of chromatic tones) is visually lost the way it's currently written. I think this makes it a bit easier to read, but lemme know what you think.
Yeah that makes sense since it keeps the pattern more visually consistent
Quote from: Latios212 on October 18, 2020, 12:13:27 PM- I think the An's in m. 13/43 may be better as Bbb's (Cb7 chord). Same for m. 29 - and there you could write the G# as Ab if you write the An as Bbb
- End the crescendo before (not on) the barline in m. 16
- m. 26 is missing the lower octave Dn in the left hand. I would suggest prioritizing that over the F to preserve the descending bass pattern
- I'd consider dropping m. 31 LH down an octave
- Fermata on the last LH note
I think 11-16 as fine as is (it starts out with a phrase similar to other sections, and only goes a bit higher). On the other hand, yes I think 21-24 would be much better using an 8va.
Updated
Awesome! Sorry, one last thing, see if you can mess around with the spacing a bit in m. 23 so that the sharps aren't practically touching the previous notes.
That should be it before I accept :3
Alrighty, it's been adjusted. Thanks!
Great, thanks! Accepted :)