The monkeys are up to something...
honestly, I’d prefer to vote xiao or THC, but besides the fact that that wouldn’t get us anywhere, I’d rather not cause a KitB…I'm curious as to why you are suspicious enough of me to want to vote me.
although I feel bad for math…
THC has described himself as an "an agent of chaos" so I don't know what to think about that.You say that like it hasn't been how I play TWG since I started. Remember TWG C? Ah, memories. Everyone thinks Xiao's a wild card, but I'm the real wild card.
Now I feel like you're being borderline offensive considering I have made 26 posts to Specs 16 lolQuantity does not equal quality. You only started providing actual notable discussion after my post. I really don't understand why this only makes sense to me. If we both survive the night, I'm starting to see you as my lynch candidate for tomorrow. I wasn't even really sus on you before, you've just been digging yourself into a hole, now I am sus of you.
That was my feeling too, and because I was just called neutral and Specs was called townie. I wonder if Specs could be THC's ward and he's paid extra attention to trying to make him look positive to the topic.None of the above. I truly believe Specs has provided a good amount of valuable activity this game and I believe you haven't. Even upon rereading your posts, my stance on that has remained the same.
Alternatively maybe I'm his ward and he's just wanted me to appear vague as to not be a wolfing target. It could also just be genuine and maybe I'm being held to a higher standard as I was more active last game lol
Dang, that hurtsAh, I didn't mean it that way. I was writing my post and knew I was forgetting someone, so I had to look back to see who. If it makes you feel any better, I was expecting to not remember who half the players were. I constantly have to double-check things.
That does feel a bit unfair toward Toby. I agree with him there.I disagree. If I had reread everyone's posts except for Toby, then that would be very unfair to him. But that wasn't the case, I only reread Specs' posts. If anything, that's unfair to everyone except Specs. Besides, he brought up stuff he had said before in order to refute my point, to which I immediately refuted back since I personally don't believe it actually went against my point.
did you look back on anyone else's posts?No. Like I said, I remembered the gists of everyone else's posts.
From that I think it's obvious you didn't look back at my posts specifically, but you did look back at Specs, is that right?That is correct. The reason I looked back at Specs' posts and not yours is because I had forgotten Specs was a player in the game, as I said in my thoughts post. I fully remembered you were in the game and already had planned on you being one of the first people I talked about in my list.
I'm wondering what to make of that and if I should make anything of it but I'll let you answer first I guess
I've at least notably said I was a bit disinterested going for either of the plans that were discussed heavily by Davy and BDS earlier, and I've also explicitly said I was probably going to vote one of the inactive only today, either yourself, math or poet. So there is some content there that I would call somethingI disagree about either of those being notable content. Being against proposed plans without actually proposing another option is only marginally better than not saying anything about said plans and voting inactives is such a default that it really has no bearing on much of anything. Plus, I feel that voting inactives on the first phase is a bad move. If they continue to be inactive after a second phase, then yes voting them would be ok (under the assumption no better candidates are found), but when phase one hasn't even passed yet, that's too early to assume they'll stay inactive. Just look at me, I was inactive for nearly 48 hours, but only because of work/sleep and just not having been on the forum until BDS told me the game started.
Sorry about that – I usually employ that as a signal so players can easily pick out host communication on normal forums, but I concur that the legibility on the default theme...isn't great. Hopefully this one fares better.Yes, that is much better. Thank you!
Can I gather from that that you intend to vote Xiao as things stand?That is correct. I do plan on voting before phase change, I would just prefer to wait for more to happen before I make a decision.
To sum up the discussions for new players:1. I honestly think claiming hot target isn't a good idea. Cause regardless of if someone is in the corner or not, a wolf would (at this point now that it's out there) fully be able to claim it at any point. That's why I don't think TZP is fully clear like (I think it was) Davy said. I could absolutely see assassin!TZP claiming hot target now to seem less suspicious.
1) Should the hot targets claim? The pro of claiming is that it removes them as an accidental lynch option, the con is that it opens them up to potential assassin attack. Consensus right now seems to be that hot targets shouldn't claim.
2) Should someone who got a normal human PM defend himself if placed on the chopping block? Pro of self-defense is that, if successful, it might redirect the lynch to an assassin, the con is that lynching one of these humans could very well be beneficial for the humans (if it's a ward), or at least not badly harmful (if it's a regular townie).
Feel free to add if I missed anything.
VOTECOUNT 0.1Firstly, can we please not do the rainbow? I can't really read the text.
BlackDragonSlayer – (0/6) –XiaoMigros
davy – (1/6) – XiaoMigros
SpecsFlyer17 – (1/6) – threalmathguy
I may have accidentally PM'd this votecount to someone – apologies if so!
