- Is there a reason why you switched to Bm at m. 31 instead of m. 39?
This is a really theoretical kind of question that I find hard to answer without being like "that's just how I heard it" lol. After the previous E minor section, m31 felt like the iv chord of B minor to me, especially when the chord shifts to B minor at m39. It shifts back to an Em chord later at m47 too, and I hear that section the same way as I do for m31.
- I'd suggest notating the two layers in beat 1 of m. 10 as usual, with the octaves beamed upwards and quarter rest below - the layers are intact and forcibly stemmed up/down elsewhere in this part.
- Give the beat 3 tremolo in m. 22 a bit more room for the lines to be longer.
Done. I unhid the half rest in m5 too for consistency since I stemmed layer 1 upwards there too.
Why not have the last two notes in the RH of m14?
Because I forgot to add them for some reason lol. They're there now.
I would also remove the first in the RH of m15 (even if it is technically there, I find that it sounds out of place compared to how I hear the original).
Nope, they're not there, I don't know why I added those. They're gone now.
For the rest of the sheet being scaled so small, the measure numbers are abnormally large.
I felt that leaving the measure numbers the same size when I scaled the sheet made them harder to read because they're so small. I wanted them to be bigger, but not bigger than rehearsal markings, so that's what I did.
Also, I made m28 RH beat 4 staccato like in the original; I had it as tenuto before.