it's back!
Title info from here. The OST titles aren't uploaded on youtube (this is the only channel that has uploaded the soundtrack), but I have the OST myself and found that this is the correct title.
NinSheetMusic is 1264 years old!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Bloop on May 22, 2024, 11:24:03 AM-m18: The dot from the R.H. F is a bit squished between the staff line and the Eb, maybe you could switch the placement of the two layers (so the bottom layer is on the left instead of the right)? Also, maybe it's easier for the R.H. to take the Bb on beat 2 instead of the L.H., as it's already playing that Bb on beat 1 and 3 too.
Quote from: Static on May 25, 2024, 12:54:43 PMI removed these (and the last few notes in m20) so that it would be easier to jump from m20 to 21, but if you think it wouldn't be too demanding I can add them. I left it for now though.I think it's fine, you already left some space for the player to jump up in m20, getting the grace notes isn't that much harder compared to just getting to the C ^^
Quote from: Kricketune54 on May 25, 2024, 05:39:06 PM• m15-16, 25-26, you could add to the RH (as a bass clef) that low F that comes in at about beat 3 of the previous measure, and have it played for two bars.I like adding that F yeah! I didn't put it in the R.H., as it's a bit weird to have the hands cross to take the low F with the R.H. and the high F with the L.H. I also added a cresc. and decresc. swell for extra effect.
Quote from: Kricketune54 on May 25, 2024, 05:39:06 PM• m41 RH and 45 I am hearing beat 1 as an Eb half or dotted half, and not hearing that Gn on 2-3I hear the Eb too yeah, but I can also still hear the G on beat 2
Quote from: Kricketune54 on May 25, 2024, 05:39:06 PM• m49 and m57 RH if I'm understanding how the layers have been done, I think I hear a Cn on beat 3 that could go under the FnI think I originally left it out because it was already on beat 2 in the L.H. anyway, but I added one in beat 3 for the L.H. too!
Quote from: Latios212 on May 08, 2024, 05:39:56 PMYou could always just have the left hand play F4 instead (on top of the existing triad). I think the resulting 4-note chord is pretty comfortable to play and doesn't add a lot of difficulty (don't think it's too reliant on hand size either? It's just a good position). But if you want to keep triads that's fine too.Oh I don't dislike that actually! Incorporated that in m1-26 and m79-86, in m39-58 the jumps make it a bit harder to play, and the extra voices in the R.H. start to get in the way too.
Quote from: Latios212 on May 08, 2024, 05:39:56 PM- In m. 33, I think beat 2 RH should be an F octave and the Ab is part of the LH dyad instead.Hmm, that would make sense theoretically (I do hear the F in the harp on beat 2), but I would've suspected that the low F would have a similar attack to the piano notes afterwards too, but the Ab seems to have that attack instead. I think I'd rather keep the low Ab in the R.H. and the F in the L.H., so that it's easier to have that Ab accentuated.
Quote from: Latios212 on May 08, 2024, 05:39:56 PM- I can sorta get why the high notes are small to indicate they're somewhat embellishments, but is there any reason for the lower voice harmony in m. 47+ (and LH in m. 63+) to be small notes? I don't mind the use of small notes for embellishments in general but they seem unnecessary here. They're just part of the music, intended to be played, and already differentiated by being in a different voice.I admittedly have used them a bit more in this sheet than I've done in others, but I wanted to show that these voices are not necessary for the arrangement to sound good, while keeping them available for more advanced players that do want to include them if they choose to. I don't play the L.H. small notes in m63-78 for example, and don't play the R.H. small notes in m63-70 to contrast them with m71-78.
Page created in 0.044 seconds with 17 queries.