News:

All Hail President Bowser!

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Latios212

#1
Welcome to NinSheetMusic, and congrats on submitting your first sheet! This looks pretty good, here's my feedback:

- The lower layer eighth rests in m. 5 and 7 should still be shown on beat 1
- m. 6 beat 3.5 is a C rather than Ab
- The Bb in the lower RH layer in m. 8 beat 4 sounds like a G instead. Sounds like there might be two G's in different octaves actually, but you can probably pick just one for the right hand to play
- I don't think the F is present in the first chord in m. 9
- The chords in m. 10 sound like (bottom to top) - Eb-C-Eb, D-Bb-D
- The beat 1 notes in the left hand in the last four measures could just be quarter notes like the rest of the piece, they don't sound especially shortened here
- I think beat 4 of measure 12 sounds more like this:
You cannot view this attachment.
- Don't forget to capitalize the N, S, and M in the site URL

Also, just confirming that you want your arranger name to be displayed as "Saava"?
#2
Cool, sounds good! The last thing I have to say note-wise is that I don't think the last R in the right hand is actually there, it just sounds like the two notes in the left hand.

Formatting-wise, this has a little neatening up to do. Can you give this topic a read and update the sheet accordingly so the music and text are properly aligned on the page? Also, the tempo marking should be expression text (using the Expression Tool, just like the dynamics) rather than just text.
#3
You're welcome! All the changes look good to me, approved :)
#4
Quote from: Tobbeh99 on July 02, 2025, 09:56:34 AMDecided to change the credit, and take credit as arranger.
Yeah, I think that's fine here.
#5
My apologies for the wait!! Thank you both for taking a look, this really is a beautiful piece isn't it? :)

Quote from: Static39 on March 29, 2025, 12:07:21 AM
  • I'm not hearing the D & C in m.37(m.36?) b1.50-75 RH. I can just barely make it out in m.36, but it sounds like reverb to me?
  • In m.38(36-38?) maybe it'd be nice to have some indication of the echoing motion similar to m.8
Yeah, I think you're right, it doesn't sound like the runs play on beat 1. I've added accents on beat 1 and 3 in these few measures to indicate the slight emphasis.

Quote from: goldenscruff on June 19, 2025, 08:32:48 PMm9-14 I'm not hearing the An in the LH, and not hearing the Fn m15-16

m23 I'm not hearing the Fn in the LH. Maybe just DAD?

m27-32 I'm hearing a middle C as well (in LH). I have no idea how they play it. Three hands? Mozart nose tech? Foot?
Yep, right on all points. For the third, I think Yu-Peng Chen is just a wizard. He played the piano on the recording, apparently. For the purposes of this sheet though, I'm inclined to just leave the C's out to avoid asking the performer to do any of the above. The half note line in m. 26 is left unresolved and the C isn't present in the LH of m. 31-32, but I don't think the piece loses too much as other C's are plentiful in these measures.

Files updated, thanks again!
#6
Great work! About notes: I don't think I hear the C in m. 17 beat 3. Actually, I think the preceding and following chords might be just open sixths as well?

Aside from that, a few visual things:
- When having a roll marking on beat 1 that's right up against the barline, using the Measure Tool to add something like 0.05" to the measure helps the spacing work a bit better
- The 1. and 2. over the endings should be aligned over beat 1 (a bit far to the right in 23/25 and left in 42/43 right now)
- I think the D.C. is supposed to go over the staff (and the ending bracket here I suppose). The staves on the second page could use more space between them anyway.
#7
Thanks for the replacement! :)

Don't forget to use https in the URL. Aside from that though, everything looks good, so I'll give it an approval.
#8
Welcome back Yugi!

It's short but there's a few things to fix before we're good to go :)
- The key signature should be three sharps (A major; A is the tonic here).
- The dotted eighth notes are played shorter in the original - as such I think they'd be better as (8th note + 16th rest).
- The first LH note in the second measure is actually an E below the A you have written.
- Beats 1-3 in the RH of the second measure are harmonized as major thirds - they should have A, Bb, and A underneath respectively. (The A# in the left hand should also be spelled as Bb).
- The last RH note sounds like an E below, and may be better written in the left hand part. Or you should just write the whole second measure's RH part in bass clef.
#9
Hey Tobbeh! Long time no see :) Please give this post a read: https://www.ninsheetmusic.org/forum/index.php?topic=6238.msg427771#msg427771

In short, we'd decided to cut back on making "edit replacements" where possible to avoid attributing work to original arrangers who didn't make the updates and may or may not agree with them. For example, the choice to use slurred staccatos in this sheet is a highly subjective one.

I'd recommend either using the Sheet Music Errors thread (sorry, I know we're behind on that) if there are any clear-cut corrections to be made (such as the octave here) - if it's anything more than that you should just consider this a replacement made by yourself. This one's simple enough you could easily write it out yourself anyway.
#10
Great, changes look good to me! Approved :)
#11
I'll stash this away for later then. Looking forward to bringing this back once our support for MuseScore sheets is ready!
#12
I'm going to archive these submissions for inactivity; feel free to submit through the panel normally.
#13
I'm going to archive these submissions for inactivity; feel free to submit through the panel normally.
#14
Thank you for checking! :)

Quote from: cashwarrior1 on May 24, 2025, 08:54:16 AMm15, 31 b4.5 lh - I don't hear this pickup note. It seems its the same everywhere, though the guitars have the pickup in the intro.
Ah I think you're right. By "everywhere" did you mean the corresponding places in the other verses? I made the corresponding change in m. 31 too.

Quote from: cashwarrior1 on May 24, 2025, 08:54:16 AMm85-86, 89-90 lh - There's a piano countermelody being played here in half notes, might be able to include them (it might be a cross-hand thing unless you move it to a different octave)?
Keeping the vocal melody up top and unmuddled is my priority here, but I suppose I can lower those half notes an octave to keep them in LH range. I'm not super keen on it, but I suppose it works to keep that line there.

Quote from: cashwarrior1 on May 24, 2025, 08:54:16 AMm57, 113 b1 rh - I'm hearing this harmony as D instead of Eb.
m77 rh - The chord on b2.5 sounds like it should be a beat earlier.
m96 b3 lh - I'm hearing a chord here in the piano part.
Agreed, updated as well as the other things above!
#15
Opening Theme

- Going off what Bloop said, I think it would make sense to fill out some of the subsequent chords similar to m. 1 and m. 3. Both F and G in the chord in m. 5/9/33, and F in the chord in m. 7/11/35.
- Also m. 5: the durations of the dotted quarter and dotted half should also be switched so that the dotted half coincides with the second half of the measure.
- The durations are a bit hard to say for sure for m. 8-12, what you have seems fine at a glance. For m. 12, I think you can use a dotted eighth for the Eb as notes within the same beamed group shouldn't be tied together in general.
- The quarter rest in m. 15 should be split into two eighth rests since it doesn't fall on a downbeat.

I'll also have to trust you on the looping structure for this one since the video ends abruptly :P