Hello from April 2nd! The sheets have been removed from the site, but you can still find them over here until we find a better long-term place to house our April Fools sheets!
Link
Link
Found an issue in the Requests Board? Let Bubbles know!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: King Glook on April 02, 2025, 02:43:12 PMSo Finale is gone now... Is there any way to create mus. files anymore?You can still create .mus files and use Finale as before if you already have it. If you don't, read this and please wait patiently while we add full support for MuseScore sheets on the site: https://www.ninsheetmusic.org/forum/index.php?topic=13086.0
Quote from: LeviR.star on March 27, 2025, 05:55:52 PMOh, and if anyone has reason to believe the title should be something else, please speak up.Remind me again what this track is used for? I forgot this game had any exclusive music at all...
Quote from: Static39 on March 18, 2025, 02:41:25 AMI actually do hear this D as a little louder although my primary reasoning is because I felt like it was the same melody as in m. 34. If I'm the only one who hears it though I'm fine with removing it.Ah, I didn't notice that! Yes, that makes sense.
Quote from: Radiak488417 on September 25, 2024, 06:41:33 PM-m5-10 RH beat 4: I understand the removal of the thirds here to make it easier, but I actually find the parallel thirds here pretty idiomatic (and fun) to play. Up to you though.(I assume this means m. 5 and 10 and not 5-10?) I'm awful at playing parallel thirds so I'm a bit biased lol. But if you want to keep it simple to play, keeping the first dyad on beat 4 is still easy to hit so I'd recommend that.
Quote from: LeviR.star on September 26, 2024, 04:36:23 PM-m1-4 LH beat 1: I agree with simplifying the LH for the rest of the sheet, but I think you could get away with adding the second 16th here on beat 1.25.I agree with Radiak that two notes in a row is perfectly fine to ask especially since the LH isn't doing anything else besides hitting this note in the intro (I agree with cutting beat 1.25 in m. 6+ since the LH is busy with the rest of the line).
Quote from: Whoppybones on March 08, 2025, 10:16:46 AMI feel like it would look nicer if in m10, m13/14, m15/16, m17/18, m19/20, and their counterparts in m21-40 had the notes tied over into the rests.
Quote from: Static39 on March 08, 2025, 02:53:59 PMI actually had it that way originally, but couldn't make up my mind about the note lengths. I'm not positive about m10/m30, but after listening again it does sound like those are held so I went ahead and changed those as well as the others.I think extending the note durations rather than writing rests is good for this piece. You can try to listen closely for the delay in the original, but on a piano with pedal it won't make much of a difference, so it's fine to fill in the space to match the style.
Quote from: Radiak488417 on March 09, 2025, 10:15:32 PMGot nothing to add, nice work. Also how is this our first and only Flower Town sheet?? That can't be right... I'll be sure to rectify that sometime soon.Thanks! Yeah a bunch of stuff here would be no-brainers for the site xD
Quote from: goldenscruff on March 06, 2025, 09:43:41 PMNice piece.
I don't hear any notes different to transcribed. I think there is a strings doubling the bottom note of the chord down an octave, but that seems silly to include.
The con pedale direction may lead performers to hold the pedal for 2 bars, whereas including some |______| then a simile would probably convey a more accurate pedaling technique.
Quote from: Whoppybones on March 08, 2025, 10:00:06 AMI also see nothing wrong with the notes. I see what goldenscruff is saying about the con pedale. I think either way works without too much detriment (for example, if I were to play this I'd probably hold the pedal for two bars anyways since I've gotta be hitting those RH overlap notes.) Looks like a great sheet though!Yeah, it actually is my intent to have the user pedal for each pair of measures. I think if I were to put an explicit pedal break in between each pair of measures, it runs the risk of the performer making it sound too disconnected by adding an audible break.
Quote from: Bloop on March 10, 2025, 02:43:27 PMTaking a quick look now, notes all seem good! Some small things to consider:- Sounds good, I opted for a clef change rather than cross-staffing to parallel the previous section, and it's easy enough for the performer to decide to take notes with their RH.
-m10, 12, 14-16: Maybe you could put these measures in the G clef too, as they're technically part of the "high" piano part? They have a similar amount of ledger lines below the staff as they have above atm.
Alternatively, in these same measures, you could cross-staff the notes from beat 1.5 on to the R.H., as the R.H. is already in that range anyway and it helps seeing you don't necessarily need to hold the chords in those measures pressed
-Maybe not necessary, but you could add a courtesy accidental on m20 beat 3 in the R.H.
Page created in 0.427 seconds with 15 queries.